澳洲阿德莱德代写论文:真理主观性

由于克尔凯郭尔相信存在真理是主观性的,所有人最终至少会变得略微客观,人们需要稍微客观才能变得主观,于是就出现了一个悖论。如果一个人没有客观就不可能是主观的,那么这就引出了这样一个问题:一个人是否达到了纯粹的主观状态。在世界历史的观点中,任何历史事件只有一个客观的真理,但是主观性对于每一个观看它的人来说都显示了不同的,个人的真理。由于人们不能客观地观察和思考过去(没有首先完成成为神一般的不可能任务),人们只能从现在开始观察事件本身,用主观的解释来填补客观事实之间的空白。这些都是主观事实;每一个都是真理,但没有一个比最后一个更或多或少有效。作为人,一个人被自己主观构建的“世界”所限制;一个由自己的思想、感情和经历所影响的主观真理组成的世界。然而,作为部分主观存在的东西,只能被理解为一个纯粹的主观世界,人们必须问,人类是否真的能和其他人一样存在于同一个“世界”中,这个问题的答案是否改变了生命本身的“答案”。
澳洲阿德莱德代写论文:真理主观性
Given Kierkegaard’s belief that the existential truth is subjectivity, that all humans eventually become at least slightly objective and that people need to be slightly objective in order to be subjective, then a paradox presents itself. If a human cannot be subjective without being objective then this begs the question about whether or not a human reach a state of pure subjectivity.Within the World-Historical view, there is but a single objective truth to any individual event throughout history, but subjectivity shows a different, individual truth for every person viewing it. Seeing that people cannot objectively observe and think over the past (without first accomplishing the impossible task of becoming God-like), people are left to view the events themselves from the present, filling in the gaps between objective facts with subjective interpretations. These all compile to subjective truths; each being the truth, yet none being any more or less valid than the last. By being human, one is restricted by the ‘world’ they have subjectively constructed; a world made with the subjective truths influenced by their own thoughts, feelings and experiences. However, as partially subjective existences in what can only be perceived as a purely subjective world, one must ask if human beings can really exist in the same ‘world’ as anyone else and if the answer to that query changes the ‘answer’ to life itself.

Sign in or Sign up Leave Comment